Social widgets shouldn't cost $14/widget/month, slow down your site, or require a PhD in integrations.
Every time I helped a client add an Instagram feed to their site, the same thing happened: we'd spend 45 minutes evaluating Elfsight, Curator, Taggbox, or Juicer. Pick one. Set it up. See a $18/month charge per widget. And the widget.js would add 200KB+ to the page, slowing the site down more than the traffic gain from the social proof.
FeedFlow started as a weekend experiment: what if the whole thing — embed SDK, config editor, analytics — could fit in under 10KB gzipped? What if you paid for views, not widgets?
The SDK is 9.8 KB gzipped. You can create unlimited widgets on every plan. The editor works the same way Figma does — live preview, no save button hell.
We're a small team. We respond to support emails ourselves. We're building the widget platform we always wished existed.
Our SDK is 9.8 KB gzipped. No jQuery, no React, no bloat. Your Core Web Vitals stay green.
Pay for views, not widgets. One plan covers your whole site, not one feed.
You own your widget configs and analytics. Export everything at any time. No lock-in.